OWASP Password Best Practices — Flassword guide

OWASP Password Best Practices

Where NIST's guidance focuses on password policy from the user's perspective, OWASP — the Open Web Application Security Project — focuses heavily on how applications themselves should be built to handle passwords safely. Together they cover both sides of the equation.

What OWASP actually is

OWASP is a nonprofit foundation focused on improving software security, best known for resources like the OWASP Top 10 (a regularly updated list of the most critical web application security risks) and detailed guidance documents like the Authentication Cheat Sheet, which covers password and credential handling in depth.

Minimum length recommendations

OWASP's guidance generally aligns with NIST on favoring length: a minimum of 8 characters at an absolute floor, with stronger recommendations pushing toward 12 or more, and explicit support for long passphrases well beyond typical password length limits many older systems still impose.

Proper password storage is the core focus

A significant share of OWASP's password guidance is aimed at developers: passwords must never be stored in plain text, and must be hashed using a slow, purpose-built, salted algorithm — bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2 specifically, not general-purpose fast hashes like SHA-256 or MD5. Our hashing guide covers exactly why this distinction matters so much for real-world breach severity.

Rate limiting and account lockout done correctly

OWASP recommends rate-limiting login attempts to slow down automated guessing, while cautioning against overly aggressive lockout policies that could be exploited to lock legitimate users out of their own accounts as a denial-of-service tactic — a balance that's easy to get wrong in either direction.

Multi-factor authentication as a standard recommendation

OWASP treats MFA as a baseline expectation for anything beyond low-risk applications, not an optional extra. See our MFA guide for the different methods and how they compare.

Discouraging security questions as a standalone recovery method

OWASP guidance flags security questions as weak on their own, echoing a broader industry consensus — the answers are too often discoverable or guessable to serve as reliable, standalone proof of identity, and should be paired with additional verification if used at all.

How this connects to what you can control as a user

Most OWASP guidance is aimed at the organizations building the services you use, not at you directly — but it's worth knowing, since it explains why a service might enforce a minimum length, offer MFA, or reject certain passwords at signup. Where you have direct control, the same underlying principles apply: length, uniqueness, and layered authentication.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between NIST and OWASP guidance?

NIST focuses more on policy-level recommendations for password requirements and lifecycle management. OWASP focuses more on the technical implementation side — how applications should securely store, verify, and rate-limit credentials. They're complementary rather than competing standards.

Do I need to read the full OWASP documentation as a regular user?

Not necessary for personal use — the practical takeaways (long passwords, MFA where offered, unique passwords per account) are the same conclusions covered throughout this site's guides.

Why does OWASP recommend against fast hashing algorithms specifically?

Fast, general-purpose hashes like SHA-256 allow attackers to test billions of password guesses per second against stolen data. Slow, purpose-built algorithms like bcrypt or Argon2 make each guess computationally expensive, dramatically slowing large-scale cracking attempts.

Is OWASP guidance legally binding for companies?

No, it's not a legal requirement, but it's widely treated as an authoritative technical best-practice reference in the security industry and is often incorporated into internal engineering standards.

How does OWASP guidance relate to a password policy I might write for my business?

OWASP guidance is a good technical companion to policy documents like the one our Password Policy Generator produces — the policy sets user-facing rules, while OWASP-aligned engineering practices ensure those credentials are handled safely on the backend.

Does OWASP provide guidance beyond passwords?

Yes, extensively — OWASP covers a wide range of web application security topics beyond authentication, with the password and authentication guidance being just one part of a much broader body of work.

Is OWASP guidance aimed at large companies only?

No, it's freely available and applicable to projects and organizations of any size, from individual developers to large enterprises building authentication systems.

Conclusion

OWASP's guidance fills in the technical half of password security that NIST's user-facing policy recommendations don't fully cover — how credentials should actually be stored, verified, and protected once they reach a server. Together, the two form a solid, evidence-based foundation for both individuals and the organizations building the services they use.

Related articles

What Is Hashing?

How one-way hash functions protect passwords even in a breach, and why some algorithms are far safer than others.

Read article →

Free tools for this guide